|
The
Filipino State
(Another way of looking at
Philippine history)
By Guillermo Gómez Rivera
Webmaster's
Note: Guillermo Gomez Rivera is a Premio Zobel awardee, a member of the Academia
Filipina and former National Language Committee
Secretary, Philippine Constitutional Convention 1971-73.
Part
1: What is a ‘state’?
Part 2: When was the origin, or birth of the Filipino state?
Part 3: What was the status of the Filipino state in 1571?
Part 4: The integration of the pre-Hispanic ethnic states
Part 5: Maturity of the Filipino state in 1898
Part 6: 1900: The Filipino people was deprived of its own
state
Part 7: Was the Filipino state mortgaged and hocked? Was it
grossly betrayed? Will the Filipinos remain to be stateless
even in their own country?
7.
Was the Filipino State mortgaged and hocked? Was it
gross betrayed? Will the Filipinos remain to be stateless even
in their own country?
Thus,
because of the confusion wrought upon the national psyche of
the Filipino people through the implacable requirement of the
English language, ----over
Tagalog-Filipino and Spanish----
the Filipino State has ended up being a virtually lost
property to the Filipino people.
The
confusion and chaos wrought upon the Filipino language and
compulsory English has somehow resulted in
the virtual mortgage of the Filipino State to the U.S.
WASP banks and to whatever they may deign dictate over the
destiny of Filipinos.
The
solution to this betrayal could, perhaps,
be the out-right rejection of the use of the English
language on the part of a more respectable Filipino
people,-------unless the U.S. government and people take in
the Philippines as a State of their Union and assume all the
debts, which they themselves did impose upon the Filipino
State through slavish Filipino politicians in the first place.
If
the U.S. chooses not take
in the Philippines as a State,----even as a Free Associate
state like Puerto Rico----, the rejection of English must be
immediately started by the Filipino people themselves to give
way to their own national language as their tool of education,
and real freedom and independence, (at least in language and
culture) so that the Filipino State will at last acquire a
better share of that attribute called "national
sovereignty".
The
present ruin of the Philippine economy, and the doormat
situation of the Filipino State, ----threatened as it is into
becoming a narco-tate---, calls for a
solution such as the one
recommended even if our politicians may still remain as
incurably pro-American at their own risk, of course.
Filipinos
in general have nothng to lose after all. Anyway, with
compulsory English, it is only a few Filipino betrayers and
scalawags who can get rich through corruption (i.e. political
power) in order to somehow avoid the moral suffering, the
actual poverty and the miserable penury imposed upon the
majority.
The
rest of the Filipino people, as it is now seen and known, are
simply being condemned to abject poverty, and stultifying
ignorance due to the frequent miseries of over-expensive
electricity, over expensive and scarce food, no medical
attention, lack of potable water and a deadly environmental
destruction through pollution.
In
the end, the majority of Filipinos must ask themselves what
economic relief, what social benefit can they really get from
talking in a mostly fractured English now known as Taglish?
Employment as over-sea domestic maids, drivers, entertainers,
prostitutes, ----including the child and male varieties?
This
degradation upon which the ordinary Filipino job-seeker is
forced into, has even turned the name 'Filipino' and
'Filipina' to mean 'domestic help' or servant in the English
language.
Is
this the reserved place for Filipinos in the English speaking
world?
Can
the Filipino people ever recover the national honor they once
had when they were still a predominantly Spanish-speaking
people? Or, will Filipinos need to become totally Chinese in
order to recover some honor for themselves?
In
time, will Filipinos ever be able to recover their State from
its U.S. WASP mortgagees that come as foreign banks and
neocolonizing impositions and conditions? Or, will Filipinos
just go on being stateless even in their own country because
economically marginalized through a whimsical globalization in
un-phonetic English?
RELATED:
>
The
evolution of the native Tagalog alphabet
> The
evolution of the native Tagalog alphabet: Genocide
> The
importantce of the Tagalog 32-letter alphabet to the modern
education of the Filipino youth
17 September 2001
|