The Filipino State (Another way of looking at Philippine history): Part 6

6.   1900: The Filipino people was deprived of its own State

When the American WASPs had, at last, succeeded in imposing their military and neo-colonial rule, one of them, James Leroy, concluded that the Filipinos became stateless as a result of U.S. expansionism. (See: “Filipinas para los Filipinos”, a book written by Epifanio de los Santos Crist�bal /EDSA/ edited in 1908).

Indeed, the Americans claimed the Philippine Islands as a “territory of the United States of America” but never gave any American citizenship status to the Filipinos as Spain did from the start of her rule.

Thus, while it was the Spaniards who started for all Filipinos the organization of what was later to become their own Filipino State, the basis of their national patrimony and rights, the American WASPs took away from the Filipinos, their own STATE.

This explains what James Leroy said.

This is the reason why the fact about Filipinos having been Spanish citizens is deliberately being silenced in any present history text book of this country.

And this all because our servile educational authorities of today are afraid to recriminate the American WASPs for having withheld the U.S. citizenship due to the Filipinos in lieu of the latter’s loss of their status as Spanish citizens and, later, their own loss as citizens of their own independent 1898 Rep�blica, —which the same U.S. WASP invaders brutally destroyed and robbed.

This is why a famous newspaper writer, Tirso Irrureta Goyena, who was also a lawyer, a political science professor, a poet and a friend of Claro M. Recto, wrote the following critique in 1916 against the unjust American take-over of the Filipino State at the great expense and loss of the Filipino people.

Wrote Goyena:

“The American occupational Government in the Philippines ought to make it known that the Filipinos now live under the American flag but are not American citizens nor can they call themselves Filipinos since no Filipino State is presently allowed to exists; that this people therefore are like the Jew, robbed of National personality; but that under the Spanish rule the Filipinos were Spanish citizens and could occupy, as many occupy still, important posts in the Motherland.

“It ought to make it known that now the Filipino cannot command American troops, white troops, because the brown color of his skin forbids it, but that this color never was an obstacle under Spanish rule to keep a native Filipino from commanding white Spanish troops, as several of them actually continue to do up to now in Spain.

“It ought to make it known that the Filipino, on account of the color of his skin, can neither be a member of a white association of Christian young men, now being organized as such into a common  center but in a separate building for Filipino associates, when there already exists one for Americans and foreign whites.

Other articles by Guillermo Gomez Rivera

• A national language lesson from Puerto Rico - December 10, 2008
• Ang Pinanggalingan ng 'Tatarin' - April 18, 2008
• The Thomasites, Before and After - April 18, 2008
• The Filipino State (Another way of looking at Philippine history): Part 7 of 7 Parts - April 18, 2008
• The Filipino State (Another way of looking at Philippine history): Part 5 - April 18, 2008
• The Filipino State (Another way of looking at Philippine history): Part 4 - April 18, 2008
• The Filipino State (Another way of looking at Philippine history): Part 3 - April 18, 2008
• The Filipino State (Another way of looking at Philippine history): Parts 1-2 - April 18, 2008

Pages: 1 2 3